Let's see if I get it.
of a sudden Senator Paolo Guzzanti told us of a number of wiretaps in which so many nice ladies and young ladies who sit in Parliament today (some were even members of the Government), candidly confessed the abuse to which would be subjected only to have the bonus policy or administration. Interception for the love of country that he does not dare to return, but that - assures us - have gone on the desk of all the managing directors of the head, so much so that even he would ask the Quirinale (also for love of country?) Not to publish .
Quirinale belies a rather dry note, but confirmed Concita De Gregorio, adding that the publication thereof would still be a crime. Crespi, but not limited to Crespi, launches into a rather violent attack on a person to Guzzanti, even insinuating that he is trying to defend his daughter Sabina near the first day of the trial set after the denunciation of Minister Carfagna. So far we are dust in the classic media of which the senator Guzzanti is the leading expert nationally and there would be nothing new if not for some pieces that I can not pigeonhole the right place.
For example, if it is true that these interceptions have gone on the desks of the newspapers and then were returned via email to a few thousand well-informed, as no one has ever published? I refer of course proponents of the campaign for anti-popes, or the entire Group Espresso, as well as some other left-wing newspaper, as well as thousands of anti-premier blog. If you publish wiretapping is a crime, the crime is for all the wiretaps, not only for some. It 's really, really strange.
And again last night at 19 the shriek of the explosion was the first case Guzzanti, say the first title of Repubblica.it. This evening, a little over 24 hours is completely gone. What happened? The impression of watching a game is unclear, as conflicting interests intersect, which are probably beyond the mere tabloid campaign.
Senator Guzzanti in recent years they have said many, many. It 'was the focus of many campaigns, so-called "public opinion" (as well as Chairman of the Commission) on facts certainly unclear, but have always painted a precise map of Power in italics all its forms: the Mitrokhin case, his agent Sasha, the involvement of Prodi, the prime ministers of poisonings in the republics of the former Soviet Union, the agent Scaramella, and many others. Leaked from the left, the senator has always had a soft spot for the dossier, for the information of the Services, for the stories of espionage, stealth in some corridors that matter, the ones with the lights low and soft, where no one speaks, but you whisper. For a relatively long period has taken the side of the center not so much as the person ever (according to him) embodied the best, or Silvio Berlusconi.
At one point, but his sympathy was as frozen, and it happened during Moscow's last offensive in Georgia. The defense reiterated by the Premier of the behavior of Putin or his puppet Medvev, Guzzanti sent on a rampage. Since then, I think, the senator never misses an opportunity to attack his former friend.
those circumstances you configure different possible scenarios:
1 - The senator has reached a stage of senility that does not allow more than seeing things as they are. He has hallucinations, he lost his head, does not know (or never knew) what he says.
2 - Senator just wants to defend his daughter before the trial, which is unlikely, as it has never missed an opportunity to attack it publicly when was 'friend' of the premier.
3 - The senator is perfectly polished and acts, perhaps without realizing it, under the influence of something or someone who has every incentive to stir sexual controversy, perhaps to divert attention from other, perhaps groped to regain control of a situation out of hand. You may attempt to redirect a controversy, subtracted from the direction of single judge of the Espresso group. The latter, seeing this, it could be run for cover, completely erasing the news.
Who knows what they think the well informed. For us, dumb assistant sad spectacle, is the bitter feeling of not belonging to episodes of historiography, but rather to the old habit of clients and very Italian exchange, I would say a tradition now become overwhelmingly
hearing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment