Can I Use A Projector As A Tv

Labor and the Resistance limited. Save

necessary premise: I am among those who have rediscovered the morning (after months) the desire to return to the newsstand to buy a newspaper, and this is thanks to the good news of 'the daily'. After four issues, however, apart from all the positive comments, which are many, I began to sense something strange, something that did not work, but could also to understand what it was. Beautiful graphics, layout, format, readability, cutting, everything, I like it 'the daily' ... except the current climate.

And pulled me a bad air is confirmed by the last bottom of Labor, entitled 'Resistance, we are full', the number of hours. In essence, says Labor now that someone starts to smell of the ship B. is sinking, we see a shift to the northwest, the jump of the Iron Curtain. And as his custom, the names Travaglio ago: Cosentino, Pera, Pisanu, Calabria, and even that 'mechano journalist', that Filippo Facci, who feels condemned to the 'Journal'.

"Before There is the temptation to save the poor from his galeazziciano all'amatriciana Silvio, "concludes the National Labor," to clarify that the entries in the Resistance are closed for a while. "

Now, I understand perfectly well that the EC has Travaglio with several people who has performed in Italy parables ideological views, and that in fact is full of changes that can not wait to change his jacket alll'eventuale change of government. (It remains unforgettable for me, having seen firsthand the Rai people to the alternation of a changing of the guard even altered the way they dress), but from there to decide that a so-called 'resistance' has a fixed number, and require a specimen antiberlusconismo pedigree, I think there is a big difference.

It 's a bit the same thing you do when someone says' eh, that published by Mondadori'. What he writes in the Journal, that other public Einaudi. Einaudi publishing with hundreds of writers, and we say the same for Mondadori, which are known to be left, because Einaudi has a known history, well known, in the left. From now no longer worthy. Since Labor has decided that it must be crystal clear away the discs Jovanotti, who as a young Reagan was an icon of hedonism, rampant than yuppismo who branded the source of ethics and aesthetics Berlusconi , by anyone who is not allowed to be 'anti' from the beginning.

Now, if the Resistance, the real one, of '43, had put such a ruling, then maybe now we would not have any of this. We would have been dismembered like Germany, the west half and half
Soviet Union. But the resistance welcomed everyone, absolutely everyone, from the Liberals to the monarchists, even some ex-fascist, to say nothing of entire sectors of the army that fought together until the day before to the Germans. Together, not against.

So, let us not be permitted? Labor itself became aware that the Journal of Berlusconi was the Giornale di Montanelli, and had fled, many years ago. Nobody told him, 'U is beautiful, the entries are closed, and as you show you mo 'because Luttazzi made you famous, no thanks, you're at home'. No, he's been successful, well received, and we have provided to all the due praise for the hard worker he is. Why the 'left', and I apologize for this misnomer has the inclusion in the DNA, hybridization, and openness to dialogue with everyone, in one word democracy. And he knows certain ethical values \u200b\u200bso close to the Christian ethics, while recognizing the dignity to all, including and especially those who think differently. The left has studied Voltaire, and then closes the door on anyone, least of all refugees and deserters of a political disappointment. Then we can discuss some

on the individual, figure out who is really disappointed and who we're just trying, but close enough and it's an attitude that a little 'scares me, because I am reminded that labor is indeed a right, such as training, he he has always said, and today is one of those who called the line of the opposition, open and close the doors to his liking, and along with those of the Republic conducts its campaigns (which by the way, I never liked to style and 'height') designed to raise B.

all. And that was what I was playing it 'the fact', as I do not play in all the propaganda and Grillica DiPietro. I agree with 98% of their bodies, but there is something I do not play well in their be (or statements) of the center-left, or alternative B. There is something very little 'friendly', closure, and attitudes of a lot 'of intolerance. Maybe I'm wrong, I do not know, maybe, I suggest, Travaglio has written a piece ironic and I did not saw the irony. We hope so.

But I was against B. even when he was a building speculators.

Angel Bites Snake Bites

policy: a modest proposal

In these times you feel good distance between voters and elected representatives, between people and politicians, including the great mass of workers, temporary workers, VAT, and the privileged few who sit in the benches of Parliament. At the same time, however, is clear (at least on the network) a new participation the desire to be there and take part in public affairs, perhaps the last attempt to save the situation and avoid a drift in this country a moral and cultural catastrophe and unprecedented political.

I think that by now the technological capabilities allow us a considerable leap in quality in this sense, and I would like to make a modest proposal, a simple idea to get back on top, something that perhaps will make you smile for its ingenuity, but as a key might be a little interesting for the future. I propose that the establishment of a true 'Virtual Room', a networking site where you can again discuss politics, economy, security, energy, or all those issues that affect us all, the community, the country system.

(I state now that there is no will to subversion, or contempt for the institutions, much less power. If anything, the idea is to discuss, support, improve the democratic process.)

The Virtual Room should be open to all Italian citizens of age who participate on a voluntary basis (ie without being paid) and its work should follow in exactly those of the Chamber of Deputies real, with some differences. First, members of the virtual camera may be in theory, all the adults in Italy. Hundreds of thousands of people, perhaps millions. They can sit in any of the wing (left-right) according to their personal feeling, without the requirement necessary to belong to any party.

(It may be possible at a later time set up group memberships, associations or parties, on this I expect suggestions)

The composition of the virtual camera could, for example, the percentages of population of each region, so as not to have ( for example) 12 000 150 Friuli and Sicily.

What should the virtual camera? It should have a simple consultative role: in no way can it be legislative, executive or judicial (of course, but better specify well). It 's a place where you discuss and put to the vote the same proposals or draft legislation being discussed in Parliament, but with a subtle and important difference: You can use the instrument of trust. And that should be discussed even those measures on which the Parliament is seen ousted from their core tasks.

Any decision should be left to the conscience of the individual, and consequently each vote would be obvious. Of course, the operation management, the regulations may be voted by a majority of all members.

could be added to the virtual camera in a series of ancillary pages, such as discussion forums, where we discuss the laws, there are explanations of vote or propose amendments to self, which in turn can be voted. This returns to the community that prerogative which now seems to have been radically removed from Parliament, the ability to discuss - and improve - the individual proposals that are submitted. Also increase exponentially the responsibility of the individual, their understanding of the problems, and also drastically reduce the critical 'across the board', the shoot zero on 'political' in its entirety, the risers against everything and everyone. The concept should be 'if you believe that all politicians are idiots, then let us see what you can do'.

For example, if an amendment to the virtual camera, by a large majority, should not be present in the Royal House, can probably be taken into account by politicians, and tabled in Parliament (which has not always been given the trust).

Members of the virtual camera should be real people, or provide real data through a secure protocol (https to understand). The problem with ID is essential to prevent the haemorrhaging of votes, patronage and so on. In this sense it is clear that the virtual camera should be a public institution, controlled by the Ministry of the Interior (or that of the reform). In fact, no individual may be permitted to process sensitive to real data of this magnitude.

But a database of this size would instantly obsolete several procedures that have so far been carried out yet with the old methods. I refer to the collection of signatures for the referendum. With a bowl so big, maybe at full speed with a few million people (Facebook in Italy has a population of 10.8 million - since checkfacebook.com) any law of popular initiative, collecting signatures for each referendum could follow a very quickly and reliably, saving huge money for the community.

Likewise, you could later use the virtual camera for many other tasks, the composition of juries Popular polls to build serious (would be a huge sample, much larger than those used by today's pollsters) and the affiliation to this or that cause, to the complete disposal and replacement of the ancient (and notoriously busted) detection system 'Auditel.

In two words, the virtual camera is merely the first step towards a true democracy, with wide participation, an experiment in constitutional engineering and social institutions and a way to approximate the real country. Everything is to expand, refine, and share the proposal, necessarily here in embryo, and that is why I would urge everyone to discuss it and make it their own, for the general welfare.

Film Industry Biggest Boob Heroine

wishes for a warm autumn

We hear talk now ubiquitous fuzzy on who what how and why, on soiled sheets, nose stopped up, more or less false information, hypocrisy vecchiamaniera wooden confessional, the usual nonsense. In the field there are always the same players that use the same old methods of collation, in the manner of De Lorenzo, methods of "First Republic" would say a good moderate methods to "Before the First Republic," I dare.

But the point is not that. Perhaps it is important to understand where the information came to the Giornale is true or false, perhaps it is important to understand who is this director of events that fire sermon against it and against that, perhaps it is important to know who and what they do all these people important in his private, or perhaps, as we said long ago, we're all behind an incredible and infinite galactic now stale crap.

time ago someone pointed out that if our Prime Minister did what he did, he could bring down the 'National Security', because while one is taken from an embrace can slang, and even if there a tape recorder on, God forbid! Well, in my humble opinion this is a stupid giant. So how do I find something stupid to continue to investigate the feasts of the universe that every world is powerful for his own use and consumption with the best#[]@## the planet. Military secrets? I do not think I have seen many jump the border, and then the frontier of what?

Italy is the only country in the world that manages to be friends with Putin and Obama, the only country in the world who pay the Taliban for kidnapping and Karzai at the same time help, we can not even criticize Ahmadinejad, too, but ready to take the plunge if the rebels had seized power in Iran. We tifiamo winners always, we are all friends! We did business with Arafat and Begin, but also with Sadat and Nasser before him, we have participated in all the peace missions in war zones of the world, who want it to be interested in our 'military secrets'? The other countries of the world every incentive to protect our secrets, because our concern also and above all their secrets. Concerning Russia and the United States, Britain, Serbia, France, Israel and the PLO and the PNA after the first. Finally, we have allowed our former colony to slap him with a picture of their national hero, how can the world be enemy?

Instead of the violent attack to SHEET B. has created a domino effect that threatens to bring down the national policy in the hands of Verissimo & Co. And if that happens there will be no duel because B. leads to this kind of 'political' Best of all, because his communication system live there for decades. For months we are not talking about anything else. There is no point in the program on the crisis, there is no action, a law that is restrictive or not criminogenic, everything is designed to restrict freedoms, especially to communicate. You lower the bead under my belt, and the power under the belt lowers the gate, aiming at the same time lower than you.

That's why I come to the point. I find that the Republic is perfectly free to ask questions, to inquire into the bed of B. and anyone else, as it is free to put the nose and Felt turarselo, and will be free to criticize Boffo behavior, ethics, dignity, and so on. If this is what their readers expect, good for them. But I tend to ask: because readers expect this kind of news? Is this not the result of twenty-five years of bending of the brain?

Craxismo During the time of happening the same things, maybe more, in this welter of banquets, dinners, banner, dancing debut in a society that followed the fall of the wall. There was (and still is) the invasion of East De Andrè remember who sang 'The Sunday Salme'. Well, at that time no one dreamed of banging on the horns of this newspaper and that the homosexuality of anyone, there was much more polite and much more attention. Indeed, the scandal was all that chatter and American English, these magazines of the fourth set, and Americans and the British called them 'the usual Puritans', not to say 'morality'.

And now here we are, with both slipped the shoes in the mud of the smallness and poverty of topics, from every bone in essence, any theory, massaged with body parts in every street, every newspaper page attachment, and now on the front pages, on the news, computers, social networks, while rain from the right and left shoes, toilet bowl, knickers from elderly incontinent, with all respect for the elderly incontinent, although not a good life .

Politics, science should be the highest in the world, has become this, because you no longer need nothing else. I always believe in the freedom to publish whatever you want, or imagine that you sell more of other things. But responsibility is not politicians or journalists who live as they see fit. The responsibility may be beginning to users, the public, dell''utilizzatore final 'all this rubbish.

Now, the public is not never gonna make it alone to prevent this fallout, the public is now deleted from the economic weight, stress, crisis, and when the law is to have fun with the twin misfortunes of others. And then, there will be someone who wants to create a few 'alternative content?'. You who have 'powerful voices', we could go back to talking about real politics? Business strategies? At the Eagle is an emergency, not a Pardon. Forgiveness does not really care for anything to anyone except the sycophants and the plots of bishops and officials.

I hear that the stories are read to 'politics', and that the private is public. This way of thinking makes me horrified. E 'square the circle, the justification of state aid to private firms, denial of responsibility of managers, the corrisponsione all of us to save a few criminals rich guy, the beginning of the road that will lead us straight into a dictatorship with the consent of all of the right as the left, and with the blessing of the Pope

Wishes for this Hot Autumn.