necessary premise: I am among those who have rediscovered the morning (after months) the desire to return to the newsstand to buy a newspaper, and this is thanks to the good news of 'the daily'. After four issues, however, apart from all the positive comments, which are many, I began to sense something strange, something that did not work, but could also to understand what it was. Beautiful graphics, layout, format, readability, cutting, everything, I like it 'the daily' ... except the current climate.
And pulled me a bad air is confirmed by the last bottom of Labor, entitled 'Resistance, we are full', the number of hours. In essence, says Labor now that someone starts to smell of the ship B. is sinking, we see a shift to the northwest, the jump of the Iron Curtain. And as his custom, the names Travaglio ago: Cosentino, Pera, Pisanu, Calabria, and even that 'mechano journalist', that Filippo Facci, who feels condemned to the 'Journal'.
"Before There is the temptation to save the poor from his galeazziciano all'amatriciana Silvio, "concludes the National Labor," to clarify that the entries in the Resistance are closed for a while. "
Now, I understand perfectly well that the EC has Travaglio with several people who has performed in Italy parables ideological views, and that in fact is full of changes that can not wait to change his jacket alll'eventuale change of government. (It remains unforgettable for me, having seen firsthand the Rai people to the alternation of a changing of the guard even altered the way they dress), but from there to decide that a so-called 'resistance' has a fixed number, and require a specimen antiberlusconismo pedigree, I think there is a big difference.
It 's a bit the same thing you do when someone says' eh, that published by Mondadori'. What he writes in the Journal, that other public Einaudi. Einaudi publishing with hundreds of writers, and we say the same for Mondadori, which are known to be left, because Einaudi has a known history, well known, in the left. From now no longer worthy. Since Labor has decided that it must be crystal clear away the discs Jovanotti, who as a young Reagan was an icon of hedonism, rampant than yuppismo who branded the source of ethics and aesthetics Berlusconi , by anyone who is not allowed to be 'anti' from the beginning.
Now, if the Resistance, the real one, of '43, had put such a ruling, then maybe now we would not have any of this. We would have been dismembered like Germany, the west half and half
Soviet Union. But the resistance welcomed everyone, absolutely everyone, from the Liberals to the monarchists, even some ex-fascist, to say nothing of entire sectors of the army that fought together until the day before to the Germans. Together, not against.
So, let us not be permitted? Labor itself became aware that the Journal of Berlusconi was the Giornale di Montanelli, and had fled, many years ago. Nobody told him, 'U is beautiful, the entries are closed, and as you show you mo 'because Luttazzi made you famous, no thanks, you're at home'. No, he's been successful, well received, and we have provided to all the due praise for the hard worker he is. Why the 'left', and I apologize for this misnomer has the inclusion in the DNA, hybridization, and openness to dialogue with everyone, in one word democracy. And he knows certain ethical values \u200b\u200bso close to the Christian ethics, while recognizing the dignity to all, including and especially those who think differently. The left has studied Voltaire, and then closes the door on anyone, least of all refugees and deserters of a political disappointment. Then we can discuss some
on the individual, figure out who is really disappointed and who we're just trying, but close enough and it's an attitude that a little 'scares me, because I am reminded that labor is indeed a right, such as training, he he has always said, and today is one of those who called the line of the opposition, open and close the doors to his liking, and along with those of the Republic conducts its campaigns (which by the way, I never liked to style and 'height') designed to raise B.
all. And that was what I was playing it 'the fact', as I do not play in all the propaganda and Grillica DiPietro. I agree with 98% of their bodies, but there is something I do not play well in their be (or statements) of the center-left, or alternative B. There is something very little 'friendly', closure, and attitudes of a lot 'of intolerance. Maybe I'm wrong, I do not know, maybe, I suggest, Travaglio has written a piece ironic and I did not saw the irony. We hope so.
But I was against B. even when he was a building speculators.
0 comments:
Post a Comment